• July 7, 2009 11:12 AM

    Endorsing the Progressive Block

    There has been quite a bit of appropriate disappointment about the watering down of potentially progressive legislation in Congress. I share that disappointment on too many issues to count. Chris Bowers of OpenLeft has a great post about a strategy that has come to be called "the progressive block" which is intended to strengthen, rather than weaken, legislation. The idea is really quite simple. If there is legislation that House Leadership and the Administration really want to pass, progressives should state clearly their conditions for voting yes and do so in sufficient numbers that the legislation will fail without them.

    Jane Hamsher at Firedoglake.com has been actually implementing this strategy on the supplemental appropriations bill for Afghanistan as well as the public option in health insurance. We will be joining that effort and others soon, including most likely on climate change legislation in the Senate.

Discussion

  • Keith Moore [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    Well, good for you. Apparently tired of just complaining that we're not progressing fast enough towards a Big Brother government, you're advocating using "progressives" to accelerate the process. At least you're doing something, albeit a rather harmful something.

    Posted on July 8, 2009 12:36 AM
  • Robert Prather [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    Keith: How is what they are doing "harmful"?

    Posted on July 8, 2009 12:15 PM
  • Keith Moore [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    Organizing to put control over who gets what treatment when in the hands of an epically incompetent bureaucracy? Giving the GOVERNMENT control over a person's very HEALTH and well-being? In what way is this agenda NOT harmful?

    Posted on July 9, 2009 12:02 AM

Join the Discussion

Post a comment