Sirotablog

David Sirota is a political journalist and nationally syndicated newspaper columnist at Creators Syndicate. David writes about political corruption, globalization and working-class economic issues often ignored by both of America's political parties.

  • May 4, 2007 9:32 AM

    "Here's a Good Idea - Have A Point!"

    I really love this - Billings Gazette reporter Ed Kemmick attacks me, and from what I can tell, it doesn't seem like he actually bothered to read the article he is attacking. You'll notice he doesn't question any of the facts reported in the piece because they are all supported (and anyway, why should a reporter today analyze the actual facts?). Instead, he just creates a storyline in his head and then applies it to what I've written, even though the actual text of the article says nothing about what he laments.

    After trying to make some sort of point about the budget surplus (it's so incoherent I can't really figure out what he's trying to say), he makes a sad attempt to claim my article was some sort of diss on Butte America - a laughable charge. Butte is a terrific place with terrific salt-of-the-earth people, as I said in the article. But its economy has been devastated by exactly what I described in my article. Somehow, Kemmick - a reporter - would like us to believe that reporting on that basic fact is insulting to Butte. It's sort of a sad, pathetic economic version of the hysterical right-wing charge that reporting on what's actually going on in Iraq is somehow bad for/insulting to the troops and "anti-American." Highlighting the realities of Butte's economy is not anti-Butte in any way - and its pretty sad that a journalist would make such a charge. And claiming Butte's economy hasn't been hurt as Kemmick implies is to behave as blindly as the CEOs who jet-setted out here this week to trumpet free trade's benefits to ordinary workers.

    Ed says folks in Butte "have little patience for the kind of reformers who parachute in like a movie star visiting a refugee camp and then use the picture of poor old Butte to trumpet their latest cause." I'm not really sure who he's talking about, and I certainly can't believe he's talking about me because I never thought the hour or so drive from my place in Helena down to Butte was the equivalent of "parachuting in like a movie star" (I also never thought of myself as "a movie star"). Maybe he's referring to Citigroup executive Bob Rubin and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke who came to Butte last week. But then, that would seem odd considering, as I said in my article, it would be strange to have the captains of global finance use Butte to trumpet THEIR latest cause in the class war.

    Ed's blog today reminds me of a hilarious line from the movie Planes, Trains and Automobiles. "When you tell one of your stories," says Steve Martin to John Candy, "here's an idea: have a point. It makes it so much more enjoyable for the listener." Words to live by, Ed. And here's one other tip: Next time, try reading the content of what you are "analyzing" - it really would make your writing more, um, relevant.

Discussion

  • waltc [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    Congrat are in order David, seems you've become enough of a pain in the ass among the local GOP establishment they've resorted to sending one of their incoherent attack dogs after you.

    You're moving up in the world.

    Posted on May 4, 2007 2:57 PM
  • butte [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    The Republicans have incoherently attacked just about everyone else in the state, why should they leave David out?

    Posted on May 4, 2007 10:17 PM
  • David - You're way off base here. Ed's the closest thing to an impartial blogger we have in Montana blogosphere, and if he leans any particular way, it's left.

    Just because he doesn't debunk any of your actual facts doesn't mean that he doesn't have a point in attacking the way you use them. He's saying that your inflammatory language and use of the facts is entirely unhelpful.

    All you've done with this post is prove that that kind of behavior is the rule for you, not the exception.

    Posted on May 5, 2007 5:33 AM
  • waltc [TypeKey Profile Page] :

    Steve T

    What specifically you are referring to as inflammatory langauge in Sirota's article?

    Because when I read the article I don't see it, sure he takes the amoralist free traders to task for devastating the country and the Montana GOPers for trying to gut healthcare in the state. But neither is inflammatory by any stretch, barring of course that the reader isn't a free trader or GOP thug.

    Posted on May 5, 2007 7:59 AM
  • Seeing as how I'm not a free trader or a GOP thug, I guess I have no choice but to agree with everything that you and David say. I guess that was easier than I thought.

    Posted on May 5, 2007 2:38 PM

Join the Discussion

Post a comment