Sirotablog

David Sirota is a political journalist and nationally syndicated newspaper columnist at Creators Syndicate. David writes about political corruption, globalization and working-class economic issues often ignored by both of America's political parties.

  • December 12, 2008 9:41 PM

    Gov't Studies Say Progressives Were Right, Beltway Was Wrong

    My newspaper column this week takes a look at three recent government reports that prove when it comes to righting our economy, progressives were right, and Beltway insiders were wrong.

    Remember when progressives protested the 2005 bankruptcy bill? Remember when we said it would wreak economic havoc? And remember when Congress overwhelmingly passed it anyway? Well now a new report from the New York Federal Reserve Bank - not exactly communists - says that bill is playing a decisive role in the foreclosure surge that undermined our entire economy. Specifically, the bill effectively forces debtors to pay off their credit cards before making mortgage payments, thus throwing them into foreclosure. The Fed estimates that since 2005, the bankruptcy bill is directly responsible for causing 400,000 more foreclosures (32,000 per quarter) than the economy would have generated otherwise.

    Remember when progressives opposed the bailout and said that while there was certainly a real economic problem at hand, Wall Street had not made the case that there was an apocalyptic credit crisis warranting a $700 billion bailout? Remember how bloviators like Doris Kearns Goodwin took to PBS to call bailout opponents "irresponsible?" Remember how almost every Establishment media voice and politician berated bailout opponents as unacceptable ideologues who didn't care about the economy? Well now a new report from the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank says exactly what we were saying all along: That the government lied to us, and that the hard data proved that the claims about a lending crisis were fabricated.

    Finally, remember when progressives said there weren't adequate oversight controls included in the bailout legislation? And remember when politicians - especially Democrats - insisted that they had "fixed" the bailout and made sure it included strong safeguards? Well now a new report from the General Accountability Office agrees with progressives, saying that there's almost no oversight at all, and that huge truckloads of taxpayer cash is at risk of being stolen, bilked, or otherwise wasted.

    You'll notice that other than a few scant stories about that latter report, the media has almost completely ignored these damning studies. In our country, it doesn't matter what the chattering class says and how wrong these fools are - people like Goodwin and the like retain their media credentials and teevee platforms as supposed "experts."

    But the fact remains that what we now have is crystal clear proof that the real pragmatists were progressives sounding the alarm, and the real fringe ideologues were the Beltway insiders who sneered at us for raising objections.

    Maybe now, having been so utterly humiliated, these people will start listening to us.

    Read the whole column here.

    The column relies on grassroots support, so if you'd like to see my column regularly in your local paper, use this directory to find the contact info for your local editorial page editors. Get get in touch with them and point them to my Creators Syndicate site. Thanks, as always, for your ongoing readership and help contacting local editors. This column couldn't be what it is without your help.

    UPDATE: For those interested, I forgot to include this in the original post. See here for the raw data on inter-bank lending that the Minneapolis study was based on. Pretty incredible how consistent it has been since they said there was a "crisis."

Discussion

  • Hi David,
    I left this comment on pdamerica, too.
    http://blog.pdamerica.org/?p=2289

    I'm trying to get us progressives to define 'progressive' and 'progressive Democrat'. Hopefully you'll join me.

    Here's the comment:

    It'll be easier to see what he (Obama) wants to do as compared to Clinton who had a Republican Congress, term 2.

    The Dirty Fucking Hippies of "the left" shut up? Ouch. Who are the Dirty Fucking Hippies? Are you sure they are the progressives, or how do we know that is us?

    That said, I believe the word 'progressive' is to ambiguous and needs to be defined (before the radright defines it for us.) How does this sound, and would you be willing to put this on your site (page, or about us):

    What does progressive mean in today's world? (taken from my blog progressivenature.com)

    As a Noun: Today's "progressive" is someone who values being able to reach for the American Dream, a fair market, civil rights, freedom, equal application of the law, peaceful negotiation, wise conservation of our natural resources, and transparency in political matters.

    As a Verb: "Progressive" is forward thinking and a questioning of the status quo.

    (IMHO, I'd like this to come from the DNC, but I haven't heard their reaction to this, yet. We need uniformity, and then each candidate can vary according to individual beliefs).

    Progressive Democrats work for:

    1. Good, living wage jobs. People need to be able to support their families and live the American Dream. Workers have rights. Higher education must be accessible.

    2. Regulation which ensures a fair market and protects the middle class' ability and opportunity to prosper.

    3. Affordable, accessible health care which (as it is defined) cannot be denied and is everyone's responsibility. The health care system should be cutting-edge and efficient.

    4. Preservation of our freedom and protection of our rights. Our veterans have fought for us, and we should not take our freedoms for granted.

    5. Rule by law and equal application of the law. Clean money laws and other corruption preventing measures.

    6. Negotiation and diplomacy rather than the use of force, although there are times when, as a last resort, the use of force is appropriate.

    7. Good stewardship of our earth. The use and promotion of alternative energy, recycling, and other earth saving measures should be balanced with the needs of our farmers. We need food on the table, but we also value clean drinking water, fishing, and hunting. Keep Minnesota beautiful by wisely conserving our natural resources.

    Progressive Democrats support:

    1. Laws that protect the life of the mother. Education which is clear about what happens in abortion

    2. Laws which encourage Gun Safety. Not "gun control", but safety, and keeping the guns out of the hands of criminals and terrorists.

    Progressive Democrats use:

    1. Grassroots campaign efforts

    2. Issues based campaign methods

    Posted on December 15, 2008 5:42 PM

Join the Discussion

Post a comment